Re: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Belousov Maksim Eduardovich

Hello, users!

 

I also join to previous question about new release.

It would be good to begin to prepare RC.

 

Can we make a plan for necessary functionality and bug fixes for further release?

 

 

On 2017-10-24 08:10, Ruslan Dautkhanov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Sorry for bringing up an older topic .. I agree "latest" / "stable" makes a>

> lot of sense.>

>

> Also what was *not* discussed in this thread is release cadence target.>

> IMHO, 2-3 releases a year should give a quicker turnover to release latest>

> fixes and improvements / quicker feedback from the users?>

>

> Would be great to see 0.8.0 release soon..>

> I see on github there were a lot of awesome additions/commits since the>

> last release.>

>

> Thoughts?>

>

>

>

> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:57 AM, moon soo Lee <[hidden email]> wrote:>

>

> > Thanks for the opinion. Yes we can think about proper label. These are>

> > labels mentioned in this threads so far.>

> >>

> > 'Unstable', 'Stable', 'Old'>

> > 'Latest', 'Stable', 'Old'>

> > 'Beta', 'Stable', 'Old'>

> >>

> > Intention is not that we want to release 'unstable' version, i think.>

> > The intention is give user proper expectation that latest release may(and>

> > may not) include bug which we couldn't discovered in verification process>

> > like what happened in our previous release 0.7.0 and 0.6.0.>

> >>

> > These are h